O.j. simpson trial crime scene




















Cochran begins his opening statement on behalf of the defense. The jurors take a field trip to Simpson's Rockingham home and Brown's house, now labeled a crime scene. Detective Mark Fuhrman is cross-examined and denies being racist.

He also objects to the defense's theory that he undermined the investigation by tampering with evidence. For a second time, Kaelin takes the stand and describes how he spent his evening with Simpson just hours before the double homicide occurred.

Criminologist Dennis Fung admits that proper protocols were not entirely enforced at the scene of the crime. The DNA testimony begins and jurors learn one day later that one in million people, including Simpson, would have the genetic characteristics as a drop of blood that discovered at the crime scene.

Simpson trying on the "too tight" bloody gloves during his double murder trial. Christopher Darden presenting evidence that O. Simpson owned similar, if not the same, gloves found at the crime scene.

Darden has Simpson try on the leather gloves in front of the jury. Simpson puts them on and declares them "too tight. The jury hears old taped recordings of Fuhrman making multiple racial slurs, which he had denied ever having done during his cross-examination , and also bragging about his enforcement of police brutality.

The cover of the 'New York Post' when O. Simpson was found not guilty. Deliberating for less than four hours, the jury returns with a verdict of not guilty on two counts of murder. Simpson is a free man. The prosecution and defense teams, combined with star witnesses, aided in the case being named the "Trial of the Century. Lyle and Erik provided some much-needed advice to the fallen football star as all three awaited their trials on murder charges in the same Los Angeles prison.

Defense experts suggested blood was smeared on them while they were lying flat not while someone was wearing them. Police forensic technicians were also faulted by the defense for improperly packaging evidence samples and then leaving them in an overheated van on a summer day.

A rookie technician had collected most of the evidence. The lab now uses barcodes to scan and track evidence. And crime scenes are also more tightly controlled. Trainees like the one who helped at multiple crime scenes in the Simpson case now can only observe the work done by two fully trained criminalists.

Andrew Smith. Teams of criminalists overseen by a crime scene manager, who coordinates with detectives, now respond to high-profile and complex crimes, Hudson said. Another criticism during the trial dealt with a vial of blood taken from Simpson.

But instead of booking it into evidence, Vannatter put the blood vial in his pocket and went to Simpson's home where criminalists were collecting evidence. Jurors questioned why he would have carried it around for hours rather than booking it and the defense argued it may have been used to plant evidence such as blood drops on Simpson's front walkway.

That would never happen today, Hudson said. Officers still get sidetracked following a suspect or victim to a hospital, for example, before returning to the scene, but today they wouldn't be allowed to re-enter a crime scene with evidence. Looking back on the case, Hudson said, "the only thing you can do is when something really bad happens is to try to make something good out of it.

More Police1 Articles. Get More Information. More Investigations News. More Product Listings. Testimonial evidence is very important because it provides a further understanding of the actual crime scene upon the perspective of an individual. The jury is able to rely more upon what they had encountered to prove whether an argument is accurate or invalid. In this case, the witness was only able to identify the skin color of the murderer which proved to be that it was O.

Overall, in my perspective I believe that O. Forensic experts and investigators were able to discover both physical and testimonial evidence to prove accurately that Simpson is the actual killer. The court must realize that there is enough evidence to hold him in prison. Need a custom essay on the same topic? Our writers can help you with any type of essay.



theocamito1982's Ownd

0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000